Not a bad idea, I can imagine some kind of PHP+HTML tag for best developer, a happy user face for best support, a golden something for best site and a golden newspaper or along those lines for best content.
Thats the easy part.
Now, the tricky part is:
[ulist=disc]What to expect from the best developer? In theory, a 9 site should be built without using code, that is one of the goals, do not make users or webmasters have to code, so from that aspect a developer is kinda irrelevant. I know we jump in to the code and make small changes all the time, but frankly, I expect not having to.
What is excellent support? I work with support, and we are NOT supposed to help everyone with everything, we have strictly defined parameters. How do you measure that?
As for best website, what are the requirements for a good website? That it looks good, has relevant content for its general topic, loads fast, is code compliant? Safe for kids? Safe for work? Popular?
Similar questions comes to mind when you tackle best content... from who's perspective? How do you rate it? [/ulist]
All in all, you need to have a document outlining the required parameters for each and all of the targets. Otherwise it will be questioned, the decisions will be based on bad data and the whole idea just crumble to pieces.
0 replies